<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defense of Marriage Act Ignored in NC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nccivitas.org/2009/defense-marriage-act-ignored-nc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nccivitas.org/2009/defense-marriage-act-ignored-nc/</link>
	<description>North Carolina&#039;s Conservative Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:43:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick123william</title>
		<link>http://www.nccivitas.org/2009/defense-marriage-act-ignored-nc/comment-page-1/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>nick123william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 03:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi this is really good and helpful to us..Keep up a good work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi this is really good and helpful to us..Keep up a good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johney</title>
		<link>http://www.nccivitas.org/2009/defense-marriage-act-ignored-nc/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>johney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That said, both laws do not substitute as a state marriage amendment, nor negate the right of North Carolinians to vote on the definition of marriage in a referendum. For the fifth year in a row, bipartisan legislation was introduced in both chambers that would not only define marriage in North Carolina as the union between one man and one woman, but also afford North Carolinians the right to vote on their state’s definition of marriage. The legislation, however, has been blocked by opponents in committee. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That said, both laws do not substitute as a state marriage amendment, nor negate the right of North Carolinians to vote on the definition of marriage in a referendum. For the fifth year in a row, bipartisan legislation was introduced in both chambers that would not only define marriage in North Carolina as the union between one man and one woman, but also afford North Carolinians the right to vote on their state’s definition of marriage. The legislation, however, has been blocked by opponents in committee. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
