Home About Contact Member Login

Life & Family Issues

NC Affirms Traditional Marriage

NC Affirms Traditional Marriage

One important part of the session was decided not at the General Assembly, but at polling places across the state. In May, North Carolinians went to the polls in overwhelming numbers to vote for an amendment to our state’s Constitution that affirms marriage between one man and one woman. With the passage of the amendment, [...]

Marriage Amendment Fight Crucial for Genuine Conservatives

Marriage Amendment Fight Crucial for Genuine Conservatives

With a controversial ballot question looming, some on the right have raised the plaintive cry that conservatives should shun “social issues.” But those issues aren’t distractions; they are instead an integral part of the  bedrock on which the whole conservative movement rests. The social-issue debate within the North Carolina conservative movement and the Republican Party [...]

  • Making sense of the gay marriage law

    From the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record of Sunday, October 16, 2011 For the record, it should be noted that a majority of the Republican-controlled legislature did not vote in favor of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage; rather, the majority voted to allow us—the voters—to decide the question. Yet, since mid-September, the assembly’s [...]

  • Republican Leaders in the General Assembly Say Now is the Time for Voters to Have Their Say on Marriage

    On September 12th, the General Assembly will convene for a special session to consider amendments to the state constitution. One of the amendments under consideration would define a recognized marriage as one only between a man and a woman. House Majority Leader Paul Stam (R-Wake) said Democrats voted for a law in 1996 that restricted [...]

  • Women’s Right to Know Act Embodies “Pro-Choice” Mentality

    No one can call themselves “pro-choice” and “pro-woman” and stand in opposition to the Women’s Right to Know Act (House bill 854).  This piece of legislation requires that women receive a consultation with a doctor, are given information on alternatives to abortion, offered an ultrasound, and given a 24-hour waiting period before having an abortion. [...]

  • Session Gains Ground on Family Issues

    The 2011 legislative session was marked by a significant amount of pro-life and pro-family legislation. The most contested of these was HB 854, the “Women’s Right to Know Act,”which would have required that women be completely informed of all alternatives to abortion, offered an ultrasound, and given a 24-hour waiting period before making the final [...]

  • Smart Start Partnership Re-Awards Multi-Million Dollar Contract to Mismanaging Non-Profit

    In a controversial decision that followed heated opposition by the public and alarming questions raised by the members of the board, Durham County’s Partnership for Children voted to re-award a multimillion dollar contract to a non-profit with a very troubled past. The Durham County Partnership for Children is the local Smart Start branch in Durham [...]

  • Government Invites Itself In: Parental Rights at Risk

    In North Carolina, like every other state, the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution gives parents the implicit right to care and nurture their children. Parents, not the government, are presumed to have the child’s best interest in mind when making choices about who may see their children and when, including custody and visitation decisions. [...]

  • The Daycare Dilemma

    2011 finds North Carolina in the abyss of recession: high unemployment, low private sector job growth, and state government scrambling to fill a $3.7 billion budget hole. In a year when state finances are scarcer than any other time in recent history, virtually all government programs will be cut back; it is merely a question of how much.

  • Marriage Rally Urges Legislators for Amendment

    Dozens of people rallied outside the state capital on August 10 to support a state constitutional amendment defining marriage between one man and one woman. The rally was one stop in a series of rallies taking place nationwide sponsored by the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). The 20-stop tour is part of NOM's "Summer for Marriage Tour 2010: One Man One Woman Rally" highlighting states without a marriage protection amendment.

  • 20 Changes For 2010: Protecting Unborn Victims of Violence

    When a crime is committed against a pregnant woman, North Carolina does not legally recognize the unborn child’s death or injury as a separate crime. In 2009, 15 states, including New York, Oregon and neighboring Tennessee introduced measures to protect unborn victims of violence. North Carolina was not one of those states

  • 20 Changes For 2010: Death Penalty

    The tenth recommendation in the Civitas Institute 2010 Agenda: “20 Changes for 2010: A Primer for State Reform” focuses on ending the death penalty moratorium and carrying out jury verdicts.

  • 20 Changes For 2010: Defense of Marriage Act

    In 2009, North Carolina state legislators had the opportunity to enact a constitutional amendment declaring marriage as the union between one man and one woman. However, the Defense of Marriage Act, introduced this session in the House as HB 361 and in the Senate as SB 272, was blocked for a fifth straight session by opponents in committee.

  • Defense of Marriage Act Ignored in NC

    Two-thirds of North Carolina voters support a constitutional amendment declaring that marriage is defined as one man and one woman, according to polling by the Civitas Institute. At the close of the 2009 North Carolina General Assembly long session, there is still no law on the books that reflects that desire.

  • Judicial Misconduct and Gay Adoption

    Conservatives frequently complain about judicial activism on our nation’s courts and they have a valid point. Judicial activism happens when judges do not confine themselves to reasonable interpretations of laws, but instead create law. Alternatively, judicial activism also happens when courts do not limit their ruling to the dispute before them, but instead establish a new rule to apply broadly to issues not presented in the specific action.

Page 1 of 212