NC Election Central

2012 General Election Problems

So far on the NC Election Central page, we have included an in-depth look at Same Day Registration (SDR) in North Carolina and the results of a public records request, to all 100 counties, for problems they encountered during the 2012 Primary Election. In February 2012 we made the same request to every county in North Carolina for documents pertaining to problems, complaints, incidents, etc. encountered during the 2012 General Election voting period. The results are on this page.

Our purposes for presenting election and voting problems are: 1) to document the challenges the local boards of elections face in every election and 2) reveal the problems that occur less frequently but could provide insight into policies and processes that may not work or may need modification.

We believe this information will be helpful to citizens who are learning about the voting processes in North Carolina. The data should also aid poll workers and local Board of Elections staff who, we have found, sometimes feel that they are the only ones who face unique problems during voting periods. Through our research we have found very little communication between local boards. One county director asked us during our inquiry whether she would be able to look at our results. Once this director learned she could see all the problems in every county, she displayed an obvious sense of relief and anticipation. We also believe there is little communication between local boards and the SBOE because the state does not require the local boards to report their problems.
We hope the information we compile will encourage the State Board of Elections (SBOE) to take on this project so that the counties will be compelled to use the results to improve the election process.

Share Your Election Story

Your submission will not be published without your permission. Your personal information will not be shared with anyone.

That a county experiences and reports voting problems should not be viewed as negative; it is to be expected. The new SBOE should require the local election boards to report all problems they encounter with voters and equipment during elections to the SBOE after the election. And we would encourage the SBOE to share the problems, its findings about those problems, and any remedies that are appropriate. We believe that a county board that willingly shares the complaints, incident reports, etc. should be viewed as dutifully tracking problems in the quest for continual improvement. In the private sector this sort of internal analysis and improvement happens all of the time.

Out of North Carolina’s 100 counties, 52 (indicated in light blue on the map below) complied and provided records of incidents and problems promptly. One county (indicated in dark blue) balked for awhile: the Nash County elections director finally complied with our request only after we contacted the county’s attorney. Six counties (indicated in dark gray) did not comply: Lenoir, Mitchell, Moore, Pender, Polk and Wake.*

However, 41 counties (indicated in light gray) claimed they did not have any problems or incidents during the General Election voting period of 2012. We believe that there is no such thing as an election without problems. Any election is a monumental undertaking that involves many people, and whenever people are involved there are always problems and complaints.

Here is a list of the counties where the director said there were no problems. We also welcome your input. If you have an election-related story – such as a time you submitted a challenge, made a protest or lodged a simple complaint – we encourage you to report your story to us on this page.

Show Counties
  • Ashe
  • Avery
  • Beaufort
  • Bertie
  • Bladen
  • Burke
  • Caldwell
  • Camden
  • Caswell
  • Cherokee
  • Chowan
  • Cleveland
  • Currituck
  • Dare
  • Davidson
  • Franklin
  • Gates
  • Graham
  • Greene
  • Hyde
  • Johnston
  • Jones
  • Lee
  • Macon
  • Madison
  • Martin
  • Northampton
  • Onslow
  • Perquimans
  • Person
  • Robeson
  • Rockingham
  • Sampson
  • Swain
  • Tyrrell
  • Washington
  • Watauga
  • Wayne
  • Wilkes
  • Yadkin
  • Yancey

The fact that there are so many counties that have indicated that they had no problems or refused to comply with our request makes it even more urgent that the SBOE make the recording and reporting of all problems mandatory. Non-compliance with a public records request makes the public only more suspicious. Until the SBOE takes this on as a matter of policy and procedure, Civitas will continue to request these public records after primaries and general elections.

The counties that complied immediately or within a reasonable amount of time with our request – without second notice from us – are indicated below in blue.

Show Prompt Counties
  • Alamance
  • Alexander
  • Alleghany
  • Anson
  • Brunswick
  • Buncombe
  • Cabarrus
  • Carteret
  • Catawba
  • Chatham
  • Clay
  • Columbus
  • Craven
  • Cumberland
  • Davie
  • Duplin
  • Durham
  • Edgecombe
  • Forsyth
  • Gaston
  • Granville
  • Guilford
  • Halifax
  • Harnett
  • Haywood
  • Henderson
  • Hertford
  • Hoke
  • Iredell
  • Jackson
  • Lincoln
  • McDowell
  • Mecklenburg
  • Montgomery
  • New Hanover
  • Orange
  • Pamlico
  • Pasquotank
  • Pitt
  • Randolph
  • Richmond
  • Rowan
  • Rutherford
  • Scotland
  • Stanly
  • Stokes
  • Surry
  • Transylvania
  • Union
  • Vance
  • Warren
  • Wilson

Click a county to see a report of its election problems in the 2012 General Election.

  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported
  • No problems reported

Mecklenburg County officials should be commended for the amount of work they put into this request. It is the largest county which makes it understandable that it would likely have the most incidents problems.

*Wake County delivered its documents shortly after this article was posted. We have updated the map and list. Click on “Wake” to see the problems/incidents the Wake County Board of Elections forwarded to us.
Click here to see a list of all the provisional voters in all 100 counties. This information was provided on the SBOE’s website.