North Carolina’s FY 2009-10 Budget: $1.1 Billion in New Taxes, Increases Year-Over-Year Spending by $400 Million

The FY 2009-10 North Carolina $20.71 billion state budget (S.L. 2009-451) includes one of the largest tax increases in state history while increasing actual spending by half a billion dollars over last year. Rather than seize on a golden opportunity to implement meaningful spending reform, state lawmakers instead used a massive $1.1 billion in new taxes to preserve the status quo.

To finance the new spending plan, state budget writers will draw on several sources of revenue. In addition to the new taxes, $1.69 billion in federal funds will help fill the gap; along with nearly $55 million in new fees, almost $100 million from several trust funds and reserves, and $210 million from questionable revenue “enforcement” and “compliance” initiatives.

The FY 2009-10 budget appropriates $20.7 billion. The actual budget bill, however, reflects the smaller total of $19.01 billion. The reason for this difference is because $1.69 in federal funds will be used to supplement state spending, especially in education and Medicaid.

Following is a list of major revenue sources used to finance the FY 2009-10 budget:

$1.1 Billion in New Taxes
The FY 2009-10 state budget includes a tax package raising the tax burden on struggling North Carolinians by nearly 6 percent above the existing tax structure.  New taxes include:

  • 1-cent Statewide Sales Tax Increase; Cost to Taxpayers: $803.5 million
    • Rate increase will raise North Carolina’s total sales tax rate to 7.75% in most of the state. The new rate will be 8th highest in the nation (two of the seven higher-rate states have no income tax). The bill includes an expiration date of July 1, 2011 for this tax increase.
  • Income Tax Surcharge; Cost to Taxpayers: $172.8 million
    • “Surcharge” would effectively force many taxpayers to pay 102 or 103 percent of their income tax liability. The income tax surcharge is slated to be temporary, scheduled to expire at the end of taxable year 2010.
    • Surcharge would be assessed beginning on single filers earning above $60,000 and couples earning above $100,000.
  • 3 Percent Surcharge on Corporate Income; Cost to Taxpayers: $23.1 million
    • Tax would force companies to pay 103 percent of their tax liability. The corporate income tax surcharge is legislated to be temporary, scheduled to expire at the end of taxable year 2010.
    • North Carolina already imposes the highest corporate tax rate in the Southeast region.
  •  “Sin” Taxes on Cigarettes, Alcohol and Tobacco; Cost to Taxpayers: $68.8 million
    •  A higher percentage of middle- and lower-income people smoke and drink alcohol compared to the wealthy. Such sin taxes therefore hit hardest North Carolina’s poor and middle class.
  • New Tax on Digital Products and Click-Throughs; Cost to Taxpayers: $11.8 million
    • Includes the “Amazon” tax on internet retailers, as well as taxes on computer software downloads, downloaded publications, ringtones, etc.

$1.69 Billion in Federal Funds
Thanks largely to the federal stimulus package, North Carolina’s state budget writers were “bailed out” with nearly $2 billion in federal funds to help finance their spending plan. In many cases, state spending on a program is reduced, only to be replaced by federal funds. For instance, $857 million in state funding for North Carolina’s Medicaid system is “offset by federal recovery funds.” Curiously, this is recorded as a “cut” in the budget even though the $857 million in spending on the program remains intact.

Major recipients of federal assistance payments include:

  • $380 million for public education, courtesy of the “Education Stabilization Fund”
  • $1.1 billion for HHS, including the $857 million for Medicaid payments, $67 million for childcare subsidies, and $131 million for a “weatherization” program for lower-income homes
  • $80 million for the “Workforce Investment Act”
  • $90 million total for the Drinking and Clean Water State Revolving Loan Funds

$99 Million From Funds and Reserves
Some trust funds and reserves are raided, including:

  • $38 million from “cash balances from special funds”
  • $24 million total from the Capital and Repair & Renovations Accounts
  • $5 million each from the Tobacco and Health & Wellness Trust Funds

$210 Million from Enforcement and Compliance
State budget writers also rely on a projected $210 million in increased revenue due to Department of Revenue actions. If these actions don’t yield the anticipated revenues, balancing the budget will be in jeopardy. These DOR measures are listed as “improved enforcement” and a “compliance initiative.”

$55 Million in New Fees

  • $7.55 million in new “general government fees”
  • $47 million in new Justice & Public Safety fees
  • $1 million in increased “health services registration fees”

Spending Up Year-Over-Year, “Spend and Tax” Cycle Continues
The FY 2009-10 budget marks a continuation of North Carolina’s dysfuncional “spend and tax” cycle: when times are good the state spending commitments increase dramatically; when recession hits, state leaders resort to tax increases – such as the $1.1 billion tax hike approved this year –  to maintain those spending commitments.

  • The FY 2009-10 budget will appropriate $20.7 billion (including  $1.69 billion federal money to replace state spending “cuts”) – up nearly half a billion from an estimated $20.3 billion actual expenditures for FY 2008-092. The new budget, in fact, will spend slightly more than the FY 2007-08 budget.
  • Even amid the recession, a budget of $20.7 billion will mark a continued, rapid escalation of state spending:
    • Spending is up 30 percent in five years, and 45 percent in 10 years
  • Digging yet another budget hole requires a long-term trend of out-of-control government growth. Even after adjusting for inflation, per person spending in the FY2009-10 budget will be3:
    • Up 12.5% over 15 years
    • Up 25% over 20 years
    • Up 82% over 30 years

Legislature Ignores Spending Reform
Reasonable observers would think that the second major “budget crisis” in the last nine years would serve as a warning for legislators to break the status quo mentality of “spend and tax” and instead enact some meaningful spending reform. Regrettably, no such action occurred this session.

  • A clause calling for “zero-based budgeting” included in the Senate budget bill was cut from the final budget. A zero-based budgeting approach would simply call on state agencies to rank the importance of their activities in order to better prioritize state spending.
  • Three different bills calling for a form of a “taxpayer bill of rights” never made it out of committee. Such bills would seek to smooth the growth of state spending, more aggressively setting aside surplus revenue during flush revenue times to save for the next revenue downturn (as well as returning a portion of surplus revenue to taxpayers.)

Brian Balfour is a Budget & Tax Policy Analyst with the Civitas Institute (

UPDATE: Some numbers have been updated from the original version of this article. The original version totalled FY 2009-10 total budget spending at $20.86 billion, including $1.86 billion. Those numbers should have been $20.7 billion and $1.69 billion, respectively. The rest of the numbers affected by this change have also been updated. Civitas regrets the error.

1 Total spending includes $1.69 billion in federal funds being used to supplant state funding in budget. Federal funds include ARRA funds, federal receipts and block grants.

2 Figure comes from spreadsheet obtained from OSBM “Calculation of Anticipated Appropriations Expended” as of June 8, 2009

3 Population numbers from July of beginning of each fiscal year. For current year, use estimate for July 2009. Source is North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management, available at:
Inflation numbers taken from GDP deflator data from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Deflator number for 2009-10 is Jan. 2009 data, the latest available.

This article was posted in Budget & Taxes by Brian Balfour on August 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM.

© 2011 The Civitas Institute. Visit us on the web at
This article can be found at

Comments on this article

  • 1

    Senior Aug 19, 2009 at 11:31

    This just makes me sick…I sent an email to Gov. Perdue’s office and suggested that she “live within the budget”. Her office didn’t like that and replied that she was more concerned about the people that was poor. Well, in the budget there is over $1.3 million allotted in medicaid funds…now the feds want to change everything around and have a “universal healthcare”…

    The 1% tax increase is disgracefull plus the increase in cigarette and alchohol tax (glad I don’t smoke or drink), the tax on tax…I though Perdue was against that…guess she changed her mind?

    I guess it is time to leave this state and find a state that can live within their budget.

    Senator Basnight has to go….

  • 2

    mabry.martin Aug 19, 2009 at 13:40

    Businesses all over the state are not only laying off employees but those that remain are working harder with as much as a 11% or greater salary reduction. So, to kick them while they are down the state adds another 2 to 3% tax increase for the employee and the corporation. What people did the state layoff? What services did the state reduce? How many state employees including the general assembly and governor took a salary reduction? This tax increase was shameful, and will further impact the economy in NC.

Leave a Reply

Sorry, due to spammers you must have Javascript enabled to make comments.

Raleigh Web Design, WordPress & Web Development