Look at the way 3 of the major media outlets covered the Auditor’s report of campaign use by the offices of Richard Moore and Bev Perdue:
Interesting that N&O and Charlotte articles are the same text, same byline, except with different headlines. The N&O gives top billing on its website to the article with pictures of both candidates. WRAL, conversely, gives Richard Moore front billing with a picture of just him and the fact that he finds the report flawed. Favoritism by WRAL editors? I think so.